Choosing the right running shoe is crucial for enhancing performance and preventing injuries. For runners in search of a budget-friendly, versatile trainer, the Hoka Rincon 4 might just hit the mark. In this review, we explore the Rincon 4’s design, performance, and overall value, shedding light on why it could be a worthy addition to your running gear.
Technical Specs
- Weight – 8.04oz or 228g for a US Men’s 9, 6.81oz or 193g for a US Women’s 7
- Cushion – 37mm of cushion and a 5mm heel/toe drop
- Pricing – $125 USD
- Colors – 6 colors
Upper
The upper of the Hoka Rincon 4 is made from a heavily perforated mesh, offering commendable breathability, especially in hot climates. This design keeps the feet cool, earning it high marks during runs in warmer temperatures. However, the fit is notably narrow across the midfoot and front, which might cause discomfort for runners with wider feet or those requiring orthopedic insoles.



Adding to the unique construction of the upper is a lacing system that stops earlier than usual, not extending to the ankle. While this might impact some runners, the heavily padded heel counter compensates by providing added stability. Reflective inserts on the tongue and toe area enhance visibility during low-light runs, although the tongue’s short length could pose minor inconveniences when putting on the shoe.
Midsole
The Rincon 4 features a firmer CMEVA foam, a change welcomed by those who lean towards sturdier cushioning. In a market saturated with ultra-soft shoes, this firmness provides a refreshing alternative that also promises increased longevity. Past versions of the Rincon were criticized for losing their cushioning characteristics over time, but the firmer foam used in the Rincon 4 addresses this issue effectively.


The midsole delivers a balanced ride, offering just the right amount of cushioning without the overly springy feel seen in other models. This setup promotes high stability, making the shoe suitable not just for regular runs but also for faster workouts.
Outsole
Departing from traditional rubber, the Rincon 4’s outsole is composed of a blend of EVA foam and rubber. This combination reduces the shoe’s weight without significantly compromising durability. Even after running 50 km, the wear on the outsole remains average, a pleasant surprise considering the absence of conventional rubber.

While the shoe wasn’t tested on very wet surfaces, its performance on asphalt and hard-packed trails was satisfactory. The outsole’s design contributes to a steady grip and reliable traction, making it well-suited for various surfaces.
Performance in the Run
The Rincon 4 shines in several real-world running conditions. Its lightweight nature and firm midsole make it comfortable for a range of distances, with a sweet spot between 10 km and half marathons. The shoe’s design ensures it remains stable, allowing runners to maintain good form and pace.
Notably, the shoe rolls in a more traditional manner, with Hoka’s characteristic “finish rocker” being less pronounced. This can be advantageous for runners who prefer a more conventional running gait and less of the Hoka roll. However, for half and especially full marathons, additional cushioning is required, and for shorter sprints, lighter models could be more appropriate.
In terms of comfort and fatigue, the Rincon 4 performed admirably during various paces and distances. The narrow fit may necessitate running without socks or using thinner socks for those with moderately broad feet, but otherwise, the shoe supports a comfortable run.

Conclusion
In summary, the Hoka Rincon 4 stands out as a competent entry-level trainer. Its firm cushioning, durability, and impressive breathability make it a solid choice for beginner runners. While the narrow fit and short tongue could be improved, these issues don’t detract significantly from the overall experience. If you’re seeking a versatile, budget-friendly running shoe that offers a firm ride, the Rincon 4 may be worth considering.
Learn more on the Hoka website
These shoes were provided by the manufacturer or its partners for the sole use of review. No implied or explicit guarantees were provided as it relates to the provision of these products and all editorial commentary is strictly the property of Running Northwest. In short, the fact they allowed us to test these shoes does not mean we are required to give it a favorable review… every product must earn it. We appreciate our manufacturer partnerships and if you have any questions, you can read our Disclosure Policy in further detail.
Check Out Other Reviewers Thoughts
As always, we gather together some of our favorite reviewers so you can get a well-rounded view of the shoe. Here are our favorites.












